Tuesday, October 28, 2008

Article Post 1: Cronenberg

Robert Koehler's article, "Eastern Promises," is an examination of not just the film, but rather more in the way of its director, David Cronenberg. As a filmmaker he is known primarily for his obsession with the body, both its shape and how it functions as a whole, which has been a consistent theme in his horror films, a genre for which he is typically associated. However, with A History of Violence and more recently, Eastern Promises, Cronenberg has found his place as a filmmaker of nuance, detail, and emphasis on character and story. What intrigues me about this article is not necessarily Cronenberg himself or the films he has made, but rather the idea that as an artist, it is possible and typical to change gears in one's work at a certain point in a career. David Cronenberg proves to be a prime example of a filmmaker who dares to try something new. Many filmmakers like to play their work safe by not changing their approach to cinema, but instead sticking to their own conventions. Perhaps one of the most curious aspects of the article is the mention by Koehler of Cronenberg's writing habits. His previous films, including all of those in the horror genre, were written by Cronenberg himself. However, his last two films, both rich character studies concerned with the narrative plot, were written by other artists. I think Cronenberg has found his current niche partly due to the fact that he has recently been looking at other artists' screenplays from an outsider's perspective. I think that it is this objective viewpoint and detachment from the original work that allows him to incorporate his most vivid and intriguing ideas.

1 comment:

Carl Bogner said...

Reid, another interesting take. These are good thoughtful posts, I should emphasize, and maybe it is just my appreciation of your sensitivity to intriguing aspects in these essays that has me interested in hearing more.

But as responses to the articles these - and I am reading this one second - are good. Your selection of articles to respond to also give a strong sense of the publication you are reading - or the start of one. Cinemascope emerges as a magazine interested in exploring or introducing overlooked cinemas (in this case, Slovenian) and in auteurist considerations.

I'll concur -- with you and Koehler - that Cronenberg's is a fascinating, evolving career -- fascinating in part because it is evolving. Hands down he is one of my favorite directors, one whose films I most look forward to. And it is interesting - new- that he is working on others' screenplays. But - true confession - I don't like the recent work as much, starting with "Spider." True - they are _ very_ impressive, on all fronts. I may just find them a little, well, dull, tidy, when compared to earlier work. Full disclosure: "Crash" is one of my favorite movies, and I crave the uneasiness, unmoored feeling, the depth of feeling, that I experienced at the end of that film. The craziness of the early horror films had that for me also.

You? What films of his register for you? You are right to emphasize his evolution, that he has a current "niche" that does seem to in part be about negotiating others' screenplays. Me, I am looking forward to the next period of his career, but I'll respect that this may sound fussy. You? What do you find "vivid and intriguing" in the current work? Help me out: what am I missing?

Again, thanks for the time of this. I look forward to the next blogs.

Carl Bogner